Back to English home Page updated: 2026-08-06 Japanese page
W
Web3 Play

English research page

Web3 Play scoring methodology

How Web3 Play weighs social heat, funding, investors, Discord, official documents and market data.

Multiple signals, not one metric

The score is designed to avoid ranking projects only by social hype. Funding quality, official documentation, Discord activity and market coverage all affect confidence.

  • Social heat
  • Community activity
  • Funding and backer quality
  • Official document depth
  • Market and on-chain coverage

Unconfirmed data

Missing data is shown as a gap. It should lower confidence until the project can be verified from official or reliable public sources.

Ranking methodology

Rankings display stored observations through existing formulas; they do not guarantee safety, return, or enjoyment.

Audience and premise

For readers who want the meaning and limits of a ranking before using it.

Instructions 012 and 013 do not alter the input set, weights, formula, order, or score.

Decision checklist

Concrete example

A high attention score does not resolve unknown Japanese support or start cost; those conditions remain unknown on the detail profile.

ScopeCurrent valueWhen unknown
Ordinary playRecord official scopeRetain unknown
Asset actionSeparate its triggerDo not mark unnecessary

Cautions

Next action

After checking the ranking's observation date, open the title's decision profile and compare start conditions separately.

  1. Compare platforms in the game database
  2. Review unknowns in the candidate database
  3. Open the playable-now collection
  4. Compare free-start conditions
  5. Run the pre-start risk checklist

Review date and source policy

2026-08-10 — Current official information takes precedence; absent values remain unknown.