Six games with 20 saved Steam review bodies are ordered by the number classified as positive. Mixed praise and criticism and unclear bodies remain in the same 20-body breakdown.
CHOOSE FROM SAVED REVIEW TEXTS · 2026-10-14
More bodies classified as positive
The same 20 bodies appear in four classes. Read the posting period and reported problems alongside the colors and counts.
Windows / Steam · Dark Table CCG (English filter / all purchase types / recent order)
OFFICIAL ART
MetaDOS
MetaDOS promotional image
Promotional artwork, distinct from a gameplay screenshot.Visual source ↗
OFFICIAL ART
Goblins of Elderstone
Goblins of Elderstone promotional image
Promotional artwork, distinct from a gameplay screenshot.Visual source ↗
10451
Positive
10
Negative
4
Mixed
5
Unclear
1
Posting period of the 20 saved bodies → (JST)
Existing polar score 71% · positive 10 / positive + negative 14Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Players praise strategy, dark-fantasy art and multiplayer play, while criticizing UI controls, unclear rules or tutorials and difficulty finding opponents. Five posts with both praise and criticism remain separate; the score does not establish current polish or player numbers.
Edition, source and interpretation
The 20 saved Steam app1175700 IDs are classified from their text, separately from recommendation flags. Five mixed and one unclear post are excluded from the 14 scorable verdicts. The English filter returned one Russian body. Posts date from 2024–2026; reports about opponents, free starter packs, 4v4, prices, NFT plans or developer responsiveness do not verify current mechanics. The separate Steam response summary is 39 positive / 18 negative / 57 total votes, a different population from these 20 texts and 14 scorable verdicts.
Windows / Steam · Goblins of Elderstone (English filter / all purchase types / recent order)
7112
Positive
7
Negative
1
Mixed
12
Unclear
0
Posting period of the 20 saved bodies → (JST)
Existing polar score 88% · positive 7 / positive + negative 8Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Reviewers praise goblin charm, village building, art and animations while criticizing 2.0 choices and raids, resource and happiness management, tutorials and bugs. Many posts contrast earlier enjoyment with later complaints. Older reported prices and demos do not establish current terms.
Edition, source and interpretation
The 20 bodies returned for Steam app693580 under English, all-purchase and recent filters were read. Twelve mixed posts, including contrasts between earlier versions and 2.0, are excluded from eight scorable opinions. Text verdicts are separate from recommendation flags. Version, price, demo, resource, bug and playtime claims do not establish current specifications or measurements. The separate Steam summary of 220 positive / 87 negative / 307 votes is not this 20-body sample; other stores are separate.
Steam · Legends of Elysium (English filter / all purchase types / recent order)
6941
Positive
6
Negative
9
Mixed
4
Unclear
1
Posting period of the 20 saved bodies → (JST)
Existing polar score 40% · positive 6 / positive + negative 15Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Players praise the hex-board/card combination and slower pace while criticizing login, UI, card acquisition and purchases. Reports about opponents and rewards do not establish current overall conditions.
Edition, source and interpretation
The first20 saved IDs were classified from their bodies, not recommendation flags; mixed opinions and blank/unclear posts remain. Reports of past redesign, login and monetization are not current reproductions or representative of all users or Japan. Allegations about review manipulation, quantities, population and fees are unverified. A negative body with a positive recommendation flag was classified negative.
Windows / Steam · Might & Magic: The Card Game / Fates (English filter / all purchase types / recent order)
4871
Positive
4
Negative
8
Mixed
7
Unclear
1
Posting period of the 20 saved bodies → (JST)
Existing polar score 33% · positive 4 / positive + negative 12Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Reviewers praise strategy, art and lore while frequently criticizing card acquisition, collection gaps and monetization. Many texts contain both praise for play and criticism of acquisition. Reported required spending remains an opinion rather than an official basic-play fee.
Edition, source and interpretation
The 20 bodies returned for Steam app3918850 under English, all-purchase and recent filters were read. Seven mixed posts and one cat text drawing are excluded from the 12 scorable opinions. Text verdicts are separate from recommendation flags; one reviewer mainly describes mobile play. Reported spending, packs, acquisition and cheating do not establish current official requirements. The separate Steam summary of 320 positive / 365 negative / 685 votes is not this 20-body sample.
Existing polar score 18% · positive 3 / positive + negative 17Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Alongside enjoyment of its card-and-board identity, the sample emphasizes tutorial friction, lost past progress, monetization and redesign complaints. This small sample includes older play and hearsay and establishes no current outage or grant quantities.
Edition, source and interpretation
The first20 saved IDs were classified from their bodies, not recommendation flags; mixed opinions and blank/unclear posts remain. Reports of past redesign, login and monetization are not current reproductions or representative of all users or Japan. A Russian body returned by the English filter and a historical/hearsay review explicitly not installed since the sale remain. Civilization, population, Discord and NFT claims are not adopted as official mechanics or measurements.
Windows / Steam · MetaDOS (English filter / all purchase types / recent order)
173
Positive
0
Negative
17
Mixed
0
Unclear
3
Posting period of the 20 saved bodies → (JST)
Existing polar score 0% · positive 0 / positive + negative 17Mixed and unclear bodies are outside this score’s denominator and remain in the breakdown above.
Reports emphasize performance, loading and control issues and dissatisfaction with gameplay. Claims about abandonment, misconduct, population or required NFTs remain reviewers’ opinions, not current editorial verification. Documented minimum requirements are separate from these older performance reports.
Edition, source and interpretation
All 20 bodies returned for Steam app2018740 under the English, all-purchase, recent filters are retained. Verdicts follow the text, not recommendation flags. Three blank/invisible or ambiguous texts remain unclear, and one Vietnamese body was returned by the English filter. These posts describe experiences and opinions from 2024–2025, not current servers, population, fraud, wallet requirements or prices. The separate Steam response summary is 1 positive / 28 negative / 29 total votes, a different population from these 20 texts and 17 scorable verdicts.
Ordering uses the positive count in each 20-body sample; ties share a rank. The polar score rounds positive ÷ (positive + negative) × 100 and excludes mixed and unclear bodies from that denominator.
These are small 20-body samples. Editorial text classifications are separate from Steam recommendations and have no independent human validation. Read the posting dates, edition and reported problems. They establish neither population satisfaction nor current bugs, popularity, fees or successful entry.
Codex classified titles and bodies with recorded rationale. An English filter returned some texts in other languages; reviewer self-selection and store visibility introduce bias. There was no new acquisition or classification. This is a six-game saved sample, separate from the full catalog and Steam recommendation totals.
Sample and classification as of: 2026-10-14 · Comparison edited: 2026-10-15
Web3 Play editorial team · Comparison based on editorial classifications of saved review bodies. Independent human validation was not performed. Editorial policy · Edited 2026-10-15